Errors and AJAX

Wednesday 29th of March 2017 01:27:12 AM In case you haven't heard by now, the hottest buzzword in the realm of web technology is AJAX (as coined in an Adaptive Path essay). The crux of the AJAX framework is the XMLHttpRequest JavaScript object which allows client-side developers to send and receive XML documents over HTTP without interrupting the user, and without hacking around with hidden frames. Now, some might shudder at the notion of allowing client-side developers who might be more used to validating forms and animating rollover images to suddenly be responsible for traversing XML documents and negotiating HTTP headers, but without risk, there is no reward. And just to soothe any lingering trepidation, I will demonstrate how to use XMLHttpRequest to not only add previously impossible or infeasible features, but also to reduce errors and improve quality.

XMLHttpRequest and XML DOM for JavaScript Basics

First, we need to set up a few ground rules. The XMLHttpRequest object in particular, and XML DOM in general, is widely supported in any recent browser (IE, Mozilla, Safari, Opera) although, as usual, Microsoft has taken a slightly different tack on implementation and requires some special care. While our more progressive friends directly implement XMLHttpRequest, IE requires that you instantiate an ActiveXObject with the same properties. An excellent overview and full feature list is available at the Apple Developer Connection site.

A basic example follows:

var req;
function postXML(xmlDoc) {
if (window.XMLHttpRequest) req = new XMLHttpRequest();
else if (window.ActiveXObject) req = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP");
else return; // fall on our sword, serverURI);
req.setRequestHeader('content-type', 'text/xml');
req.onreadystatechange = xmlPosted;
function xmlPosted() {
if (req.readyState != 4) return;
if (req.status == 200) {
var result = req.responseXML;
} else {
By being language independent, XML bypasses the requirement to have a standard binary encoding or storage format. Language independence also fosters immense interoperability amongst heterogeneous systems. It is also good for future compatilbilty. For example, if in the future a product needs to be changed in order to deal with a new computing paradigm or network protocol, by keeping XML flowing through the system, addition of a new layer to deal with this change is feasible. 

DOM and SAX are open, language-independent set of interfaces

By defining a set of programming language independent interfaces that allow the accessing and mutation of XML documents, the W3C made it easier for programmers to deal with XML. Not only does XML address the need for a standard information encoding and storage format, it also allows programmers a standard way to use that information. SAX is a very low level API, but it is more than what has been available before it. DOM is a higher level API that even provides a default object model for all XML documents (saving time in creating one from scratch if you are using data is document data).

SAX, DOM and XML are very developer friendly because developers are going to decide whether this technology will be adopted by the majority and become a successful effort towards the goal of interoperable, platform, and device independent computing.

XML is web enabled


The potential uses for this powerful tool are vast, and exploration of the possibilities has just begun. But before anyone gets carried away with trying to create an XML circus on the web, I suggest we set up a safety net to keep any high-flyers from breaking their necks.

JavaScript Error Handling Basics

JavaScript has come a long way since its earlier versions, which were crude, lacking in features, and just poorly implemented. Newer browsers not only support the try/catch/finally keywords you will recognize from C++ and Java, they also implement an onerror event that can trap any error conditions that arise during runtime. Usage is pretty straightforward:

function riskyBusiness() {
try {
} catch (e) {
} finally {
window.onerror = handleError; // safety net to trap all errors
function handleError(message, URI, line) {
return true; // this will stop the default message

A Practical Example: Persisting Client-side Errors to your Server

Now that we have the basics of XMLHttpRequest and JavaScript error handling, let's look at an implementation that ties the two together. You'd think that JavaScript errors would be easy to spot given the prevalent "Yellow Triangle of Death", but I still see them slip past the QA departments of several blue chip organizations' public-facing web sites.

Figure 1

So, here I will present a method for trapping errors and logging them back to the server in the hope that someone might be alerted to fix it. First, let's consider our client. The client should provide a class to be used as a singleton Logger object that can transparently handle the gritty details.

First we create the constructor:

function Logger() {
this.errorToXML = errorToXML;
this.log = log;

Next, we define the method that will serialize an Error object into XML. By default, an Error object only has two properties, name and message, but we will also check for a third called location which may be useful.

function errorToXML(err) {
var xml = '<?xml version="1.0"?>\n' +
'<error>\n' +
'<name>' + + '</name>\n' +
'<message>'  + err.message + '</message>\n';
if (err.location) xml += '<location>' + err.location +
xml += '</error>';
return xml;

Next is the log method. This is the meat and potatoes of the script that really brings together the principles described above. Notice that we are using the POST method for our call. What I am essentially creating here is a bespoke web service that is write-only and creates new records on each successful request. Therefore, POST is the only appropriate option.

function log(err) {
if (window.XMLHttpRequest) this.req = new XMLHttpRequest();
else if (window.ActiveXObject) this.req =
new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP");
else return; // throw up our hands in despair"POST", "/cgi-bin/AjaxLogger.cgi");
this.req.setRequestHeader('REFERER', location.href);
this.req.setRequestHeader('content-type', 'text/xml');
this.req.onreadystatechange = errorLogged;
this.timeout = window.setTimeout("abortLog();", 10000);

The last part of our class definition is to create an instance of the Logger class. There should be only one instance of this class.

var logger = new Logger();

The last two functions are just there for housekeeping. If something goes wrong while logging the error, there is not much we can do except bother the user. Hopefully, it will never come to this. These are not class methods since the events will not have references to our object, but will refer to the logger instance we just created.

function abortLog() {
alert("Attempt to log the error timed out.");
function errorLogged() {
if (logger.req.readyState != 4) return;
if (logger.req.status >= 400)
alert('Attempt to log the error failed.');

All of the preceding code can be wrapped up into one .js file that can be included on any (or every) page in your site. Here is an example of how to include it and put it to good use:

<script type="text/javascript" src="Logger.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
function trapError(msg, URI, ln) {
var error = new Error(msg);
error.location = URI + ', line: ' + ln; // add custom property
return true; // stop the yellow triangle
window.onerror = trapError;
function foo() {
try {
} catch (err) {
err.location = location.href + ', function: foo()';
function warnUser() {
alert("An error has occurred while processing this page."+
"Our engineers have been alerted!");
location.href = '/path/to/error/page.html';

Now that we have seen how to integrate the logger into our HTML pages, all that is left is to define some way of receiving and translating the message. I have chosen a lowest common denominator approach and built a CGI script in Perl that uses one of my favorite modules, XML::Simple, to parse the post data, and CGI::Carp to pipe the results directly to httpd error log, thus saving your system administrators from having to monitor another log. This script also includes some good examples of appropriate response codes for different success and failure conditions.

use CGI;
use CGI::Carp qw(set_progname);
use XML::Simple;
my $request = CGI->new();
my $method = $request->request_method();
# method must be POST
if ($method eq 'POST') {
eval {
my $content_type = $request->content_type();
if ($content_type eq 'text/xml') {
print $request->header(-status =>
'415 Unsupported Media Type', -type => 'text/xml');
croak "Invalid content type: $content_type\n";
# when method is POST and the content type is neither
# URI encoded nor multipart form, the entire post
# is stuffed into one param: POSTDATA
my $error_xml = $request->param('POSTDATA');
my $ref = XML::Simple::XMLin($error_xml);
my ($name, $msg, $location) =
($ref->{'name'}, $ref->{'message'}, '');
$location = $ref->{'location'} if (defined($ref->{'location'}));
# this will change the name of the carper in the log
set_progname('Client-side error');
my $remote_host = $request->remote_host();
carp "name: [$name], msg: [$msg], location: [$location]";
if ($@) {
print $request->header(-status => '500 Internal server error',
-type => 'text/xml');
croak "Error while logging: $@";
} else {
# this response code indicates that the operation was a
# success, but the client should not expect any content
print $request->header(-status => '204 No content',
-type => 'text/xml');
} else {
print $request->header(-status => '405 Method not supported',
-type => 'text/xml');
croak "Unsupported method: $method";

And that's all there is to it! Now, the next time some slippery JavaScript gets into the system, you can expect your log monitors to start flashing red lights and your client-side developers to get calls in the middle of the night.

floated so far up that it intrudes into a paragraph that has already been displayed by the user agent.

In this case, it's up to the user agent, but the CSS specifications explicitly state that user agents are not required to reflow previous content to accommodate things that happen later in the document. In other words, if an image is floated up into a previous paragraph, it may simply overwrite whatever was already there. On the other hand, the user agent may handle the situation by flowing content around the float, even though doing so isn't

There are nine distinct styles for theproperty border-style defined in CSS1, includingthe default value of none. They are demonstratedin Figure 7-29.

Figure 7-29

Figure 7-29. Border styles


The most interesting border style is double.It's defined such that the width of the two lines, plus thewidth of the space between them, is equal to the value of Keywords

Easiest to understand are thekeywords. They have the effects you'd expect from their names;for example, top right wouldcause the background image to be placed in the top right corner ofthe element. Let's go back to the small yin-yang symbol:

BODY {background-image: url(yinyang.gif);background-repeat: no-repeat;background-position: top right;}